Adrian Sainz
My Experience

Designer x Research x Healthcare.

At Natera, I lead UX for lab operations and enterprise tools, bridging research and product in a space where that gap is rarely closed. At AthenaDAO, I shape which women's health research gets funded and why. Through my Substack, “Women's Health, Computed,” I write about femtech, perimenopause, and the distance between what science knows and what products actually do with it.

That thread runs back to Cincinnati Children's Hospital, where I worked with investigators on NIH-funded clinical research (1, 2, 3), and through my PhD, which included a collaboration with Clue on perimenopause symptom tracking.


My Approach
What I believe

I’ve spent ten years watching healthcare technology fail people in predictable ways. That shapes how I work.

AI should augment clinical judgment, not simulate it. The handoff between algorithmic confidence and human decision-making is the central design problem in health, and it’s almost always designed poorly.

Compliance and good UX are not opposites. Regulated environments constrain the solution space, not the quality of thinking.

The best health interfaces disappear. The worst cause harm. The difference is a research decision that happened, or didn’t, before the first wireframe.

Design is a political act. Who gets centered, who gets left out: those are choices whether you make them consciously or not. I try to.


As a Human

When I'm not working, I'm cycling the Bay, hiking, dancing, traveling somewhere new, or deep in a book.


Published
Papers, patent, talks

Next
Currently looking for

Hard problems at the intersection of health and AI — where design decisions are consequential, users are under pressure, and getting it wrong has real costs.

Available for: keynotes on AI and health UX, advisory roles in femtech and clinical AI, research consulting.

Building something in health and AI? Let's talk.